If a tenant terminates a lease by purchasing the leased property, the IRS requires capitalization of the entire purchase price. However, some courts have allowed the excess price to be deducted above fair market value as the cost of purchasing an expensive lease. THIRD PARTY BUYER If a third party follows in the footsteps of the landlord, payments for the property and the associated lease agreement will not be treated separately. As mentioned above, Article 167(c)(2) provides that if property is acquired under a lease, no part of the adjusted base may be allocated to the rental interest. The entire adjusted base is used to calculate the depreciation of the leased property. Treatment under Article 197 of the IRC, amortization of goodwill and certain other intangible assets, is excluded by Article 167(c)(2). Thus, the adjusted base of the property is recovered by depreciation. Lease payments received would be ordinary income. If the lease was acquired only by a third party in a transaction that does not include the property itself, paragraph 197(e)(5)(a) disqualifies the rental interest from depreciation under section 197.
The biggest tax issue with rental options is the timing of the transfer of ownership. If the IRS determines that the transfer was a lease option, the transfer of ownership will occur when the call option is exercised. Pre-purchase payments remain rental fees for the buyer (tenant) and rental income for the seller (owner). The Internal Revenue Service recognizes two main deduction classes for your home. As long as you enter your deductions on Schedule A, you can amortize your mortgage interest and property taxes. However, rental payments are not deductible, even if you have the option to purchase the property. However, you may be able to claim a tenant loan if your state offers one. Owner as seller. For the landlord, the tax consequences of calling the lease-on-sale transaction are as follows: CPAs with Customers in the Sixth Circuit (Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee) may find legal precedents that support the use of a deduction for the portion of a tenant`s purchase price that is due to an expensive lease. However, due to the Millinery Center case, Second Circuit taxpayers (New York, Connecticut, and Vermont) may be in a weaker position to make such a deduction.
CPAs may wish to assess the authorities and decide whether to seek substantial authority for a deduction element or to capitalize costs. When a lease option is treated as a sale, there are two important tax implications: You must first determine whether your agreement is a lease agreement or a conditional purchase agreement. If the contract is a lease agreement, you can deduct the payments as rent. If the agreement is a conditional purchase agreement, consider yourself a direct purchaser of the equipment. You can usually recover the cost of these properties used in a business or business through capital cost allowances. Is the tenant obliged to make improvements to the property? A tenant will generally not accept such a clause if he plans to leave at the end of the lease. The improvements increase the tenant`s investment in the property; these investments will only be recovered if the tenant exercises the purchase option. Whether you`re renting or owning commercial real estate, rental options are a common clause in most commercial leases. The potential tax implications of leasing options vary depending on the terms of the agreement. Knowing the potential tax consequences of commercial rental options can help you avoid unpleasant surprises in April.
Whether it is a leasing contract or a conditional purchase agreement depends on the intention of the parties, as set out in their agreement, which is read in the light of the facts and circumstances at the time of its conclusion. Determine the intention of the parties based on the facts and circumstances present at the time of the conclusion of the agreement. A single test or a special combination of tests does not always apply. A lease with an option to purchase can provide strategic value for buyers and sellers, but you should be careful to avoid IRS requalification. An appraiser can help you set payments and option prices at market value to increase the chances of surviving the audit. However, the mere fact that the option price is a “bargain price” does not in itself lead to the leasing option business being called a sale. If the option price represents a substantial portion of the fair market value of the property, the rent is equal to the actual fair rental value, and the rent payments are not applied to the purchase price, the lease option is not called a sale. A lease with an option to purchase, also known as a “rental option”, is a common real estate contract.
The important issue of income tax in lease option transactions is whether the tenant rented the property or, as an economic reality, an installment sale took place before the tenant exercised the call option. If a lease becomes onerous (the obligation exceeds the benefits), a taxpayer may try to terminate it. If the tenant pays a cancellation fee, the tax law usually allows a deduction, as there is no future benefit. As an alternative to cancellation, the tenant could buy the property from the owner. A recent dispute shows that the tax treatment of such a purchase by the tenant is unclear, although the tax results of lease terminations are more predictable from the landlord`s point of view. If the owners hold rental property as commercial or commercial assets, the gains or losses from the sale of the property are gains or losses under section 1231. Payments resulting from the termination of leases would then fall outside the scope of section 1234A and would result in gains or losses under section 1231 because the related property is not a capital asset within the meaning of section 1221. Net gains under section 1231 naturally receive the treatment of capital gains, while net losses under section 1231 are common (see “The best of both worlds?” JofA, March 9, p. 64). Whether owners own real estate as commercial or commercial assets over fixed assets depends on whether essential services that go beyond basic property management tasks are provided on behalf of tenants. However, there is a precedent for a withdrawal in the Sixth Circle.
At the Cleveland Allerton Hotel (36 AFTR 862 (6th Cir. 1948)), a tenant who paid inflated rent of about $15,000 per year and still had 80 years of lease negotiated the acquisition of the property for an amount that exceeded the market value of $241,250. The Sixth Circuit overturned the Tax Court and allowed a deduction while criticizing the IRS for putting the form above the merits by requiring a taxpayer to capitalize on an asset with a fair market value more than twice as high. The IRS did not dispute the taxpayer`s assertion that the lease was onerous. Rather, it argued that the legal wording of section 167(c)(2) prohibits a deduction for the portion of the purchase price attributable to the onerous lease. This provision does not allow one of the bases to be transferred to the hereditary building right if “property is acquired under a rental contract”. The law does not define “subject to a lease,” but the IRS and the Tax Court interpret the term as subject to a lease prior to acquisition. The taxpayer argued in vain that the law referred only to outstanding leases and that he was entitled to the deduction since the acquisition of the vessel had terminated the leasing contract. However, this treatment would not apply if the landlord sells a lease to a third party.
In this case, the seller would recognize the ordinary income from the proceeds of the sale. A lease where the tenant must make significant improvements can also confirm a sale. As with inflated rents, the theory is that the tenant can only recoup their investment by exercising the option. Donald J. Valachi, CCIM, CPA, is a Clinical Associate Professor of Real Estate at the University of Southern California. He has been an investor and residential broker for 15 years. Example 1: Grant the option. Susan buys a two-year option to buy a small apartment building from John for $500,000. Susan pays John $15,000 for this option. Receiving payment of the $15,000 option has no immediate tax consequences for Susan (the option holder) or John (the optionor). The receipt of the consideration for the option is treated as a non-taxable open transaction.
The transaction remains open until Susan exercises the option or lets it expire. Example 2: Exercise of the option. Six months later, Susan exercised the option and bought the house for $500,000. Susan`s tax base for the property is $515,000 ($500,000 + $15,000). John`s realized amount from the sale is also $515,000. Example 3: Sell the option at a profit. Instead of buying the building, Susan decides after a year to sell the option for $20,000. Since apartment § 1231 would have been property if Susan had acquired it, she declares a profit § 1231 of $5,000 ($20,000 – $15,000). .